In reality, these different forms of ornamentation are rather more closely related to one another than one might at first think and to see that, one need only look back at some of the extant medieval albs we still have (including two medieval albs attributed to St. Francis of Assisi and Pope Boniface VIII).
This alb I would like to feature today is thought to hail from the 1100's (though some scholars have put it as late as the 1400's) and belongs to the so-called "paraments of San Bonifacio," one time Bishop of Ferento. What you will note about this alb are the decorative textiles that have been attached to it, specifically, around the neck, the cuffs of the sleeves and the base of the alb. This follows the model mentioned above related to the use of apparels. Let's take a look:
Left: 12th century Italian alb. Right: Late 17th cent. Italian lace alb. |
What this comparative illustration hopefully demonstrates is that there is, in point of fact, quite a close proximity between the apparelled form of alb and the later lace form. In reality, lace was merely an alternate form of decoration, just as embroidery was, and you will observe the lace is similarly placed on the sleeves/cuffs as well as the base of the alb. In reality then, the two forms are merely stylistic variations on the very same decorative theme and approach.
The one exception I would make to this are albs (or, more commonly, surplices) that are made entirely of lace. (See an example.) These are arguably a case of over-reach, insofar as it is a case of the secondary becoming the primary. The parallel would be if the apparelled appliqué were to cover over the entirely of the alb. In that regard, tasteful restraint, recognizing its place as an ornamental accent, not the substance of the vesture, is certainly to be recommended as it better respects and reflects the origins and history of this item of ecclesiastical vesture.